|
December 13, 2001
I was wholly unprepared for the level of poverty and desperation I witnessed
among refugees on a recent trip to Afghanistan. If you have never imagined the
refugee camps, visualize a seemingly endless stretch of scrap-and-stick tents,
filled with raucous children, lacking food, water, basic hygiene or
infrastructure. Border it with stunning stark mountains, surround it with cold
air and support it with dirt and dust. Then you will have an idea of the
conditions under which Afghan refugees fleeing American bombs are attempting to
survive.
After the tragedies of Sept. 11, when it became clear that the U.S. would
retaliate against Osama bin Laden's terrorist attacks though a campaign against
Afghanistan, I began to worry. I had heard about "collateral damage"
and "smart bombs" during the Gulf War. My gut tightened when I heard
these rhetorical strategies deployed now. My father, a career U.S. Army officer,
was deployed to the Gulf with those very phrases in 1990. This time it was my
turn to travel to the region, to see for myself the effects of U.S. military
action.
In late November I traveled to Jalalabad, Kabul, Peshawar and Islamabad on a
four-woman delegation organized by Global Exchange, the human rights
organization where I have worked for the last eight years. I also represented
the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, the oldest women's peace
organization in the U.S. and, as a result, I focused particularly on the issue
of women in a post-Taliban government and the condition of children in the
refugee camps. But my main personal aim was just to witness, and what I
witnessed was extremely troubling.
There was Ramsir, A 24-year-old Tajik mother whose 5-year-old child is
psychologically damaged from the recent bombing. Rasmir's daughter was at a park
in Kabul when American bombs, aimed at the airport, missed their mark and killed
three of her playmates. The women in the park screamed, "Where's my
child?!" Rasmir told me, as they searched for remains among the shrapnel.
After this, Rasmir and her children, who remained in Kabul through both the
mujahedeen and the Taliban regimes, fled the country. Before the slaughter in
the park, Rasmir's neighbor's house had been hit by U.S. bombs. All nine members
of the family were killed. Rasmir told me the shock her daughter experienced in
the park was too much.
I met Rasmir at the Afghanistan Women's Council, a food distribution, health
and educational services project for refugee women and children in Peshawar,
Pakistan. Directed by Fatana Gailani, the center has recently been inundated by
refugees fleeing not only the Taliban but the American bombing. I asked Gailani
if she supported the U.S. bombing campaign, as I expected an educated woman from
Kabul would. "Like most people, I was happy at first, as I am eager to
return to a liberated Afghanistan," she said. "But then I started
seeing the flow of refugees, almost every one with a story of civilian
casualties. And now I say that the bombing must stop. We innocent Afghans are
paying the price."
Another vivid memory is of Haziza, a 12-year-old girl living in a refugee
relief center in Peshawar. I sat with Haziza while an elderly woman told us she
had lost her three sons -- one to the Russians, one to the mujahedeen and one to
the Taliban. As Haziza started sniffling, another visitor to the center asked
the girl crudely, "Why are you crying?" to which she responded with
deeper sobs. As I reached to embrace Haziza, I could feel her body brace against
the deepest pain. "We lived in Kabul near one of the Taliban military
bases, where my father had a small grocery store," she said. "One day
I was out with my father, when we saw planes roaring overhead and heard scary,
loud sounds like thunder. When we returned home, my mother and younger brother
were lying dead in a pile of rubble that was once our house. My father went into
shock and lost his mind. Now I'm the one in charge of our household. I take care
of my five brothers and sisters. We have no money and it's hard for me to find
them enough food to eat."
I also met refugees in a camp on the road from the Khyber Pass to Jalalabad.
They were from the nearby village of Duranta, which was nearly hit by American
bombs that were targeting a Taliban camp and missed. After the bombing,
inhabitants of the entire village fled. Eight days later, they began returning
home in a trickle. But they have been terrorized by the bombing. I took a
picture of 17 children standing in front of the village; the backdrop to the
photo is bomb craters.
How many civilian deaths have occurred since the bombing campaign of
Afghanistan began? I asked several Afghans if they could estimate the number.
The estimates I heard ranged from 1,000 to 5,000. When I relayed that figure to
a U.S. reporter upon my return, she paused and countered that it actually wasn't
that many, considering we are at war. I replied that it was approximately the
same number of innocent people who died in the World Trade Center attack. Have
we become the evil we deplore?
The answer to the question will emerge as Afghanistan rebuilds itself, as
more exact numbers of civilian casualties emerge, as our promises of aid are
either met or retracted. But whatever the postwar Afghanistan looks like, the
battle will be uphill. Afghanistan has long been a country in crisis. It has
been devastated by over two decades of war. Ten percent of all land mines in the
world are there. Life expectancy is 45 years of age, and Afghanistan's infant
mortality rate rivals the poorest African nations. The national literacy rate is
10 percent and diminishes by half for women. Tribal warlordism and monarchy are
the two political arrangements familiar to the Afghan people. Those traditions
are resistant to change, and their remnants are the primary components of the
new coalition government that resulted from talks in Bonn in November.
One step toward stability in Afghanistan is the incorporation of women in
government, or their re-incorporation. Women were part of the loya jirga,
traditional parliament, in Afghanistan before the wars, and I met several
accomplished women who could be pivotal to rebuilding the country. In the end,
two women were chosen to be part of the transitional government: Sima Samar,
vice minister for women's affairs, and Suhaila Seddiqi, who will be appointed
minister of health. "I'm elated," said Khorshid Noori, coordinator of
the Afghan Women's Network in reference to Samar and Seddiqi's inclusion in the
government. After five years of Taliban rule and the Northern Alliance before
them, it's a start, though the general sentiment is it's far from enough.
The question put to me most often by Afghans relates to U.S. interests in the
region. After the Russians were defeated in the late '80s, the U.S. government,
and the rest of the international community, abandoned Afghanistan, leaving it
to the warlords, militant foreigners and the interests of its more powerful
neighbors, particularly Pakistan and Iran. The Afghans feel deeply skeptical
about the motives of the United States in ousting the Taliban. If the U.S.
concentrates its future aid on a much-touted Unocal pipeline, they tell me, then
their worst fears about the U.S. intervention will have come true. Although the
pipeline will be a source of future jobs in the region, many will see it as the
reason the U.S. came back to Afghanistan.
The U.S. has much to prove to the people of this bomb-ravaged nation. The
U.N.'s World Food Program is currently engaged in a Herculean effort to
distribute 52,000 tons of food per month for the 6 million people rendered
dependent from the bombings, 23 years of war and three years of drought. Aside
from the mind-boggling logistical arrangements, there are two primary obstacles
to the provision of aid. One is the U.S. bombing. Aid workers cannot distribute
food under the present military campaign. The second obstacle is the banditry
and looting taking place in the void of a central government. The solution to
this is the immediate deployment of U.N. peacekeepers. At the time of this
writing, the Bush administration was still obfuscating attempts by the U.N.,
France, Jordan, Turkey and Bangladesh to send an international delegation to
secure food distribution in unruly areas. If food aid does not get through, and
Afghans die by the thousands this winter, they will know whom to blame.
Traveling the six-hour road from Jalalabad back to Peshawar, I found myself
wondering about Afghanistan's postwar economy. Afghanistan does not have
significant source of income other than its trade in opium. The country is the
largest exporter of the drug in the world. If the international community,
particularly the U.S., comes through with the billions of dollars, then, besides
rebuilding the areas destroyed by bombs, it must help create viable economic
alternatives to the opium trade and incentives for men to put down their guns.
The reconstruction also must be sustained by locally based programs for income
generation that do not put Afghanistan into environmentally dangerous industries
or exploit its labor for the benefit of U.S. corporations. We must not put
Afghanistan on a debt treadmill that leaves the country beholden to the economic
dictates of its benefactors, nor the World Bank. In fact, reconstruction should
start with the canceling of the $50 million in debt held by the International
Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
The Afghan women I met insisted I repeat as often as necessary that aid must
also focus on women and children. They told me future aid must target education,
health and job opportunities for the young. The need to focus on children is
obvious. The majority of Afghans are under 18 years old, meaning that well over
half the country has spent all of their years under the scourge of war. Women
also make up 60 percent of the country. They were denied the right to study,
work and receive medical care under the Taliban, and were subjected to mass rape
when the Northern Alliance held Kabul. Afghan women have been delivering needed
assistance during two decades of refugee crisis, while the U.S. looked away. Now
is the time for them to take greater control.
One fine example of the success of female-run aid programs is the
Humanitarian Assistance for Women and Children of Afghanistan (HAWCA)
organization, which was founded three years ago by 27-year-old Orzala Ashrawf.
HAWCA, based in Peshawar, serves the refugee community by providing
income-generating projects and literacy classes to women. It also provides
classes once a week to girl carpet-weavers. Visiting one Sunday morning, I met a
classroom full of girls. Every one was afflicted with a deep phlegmy cough from
the daily inhalations of thread lint. Yet each one displayed a shining desire to
learn to read and write. The youngest was 5. I asked her if she had any time to
play amidst her labors. She said no. I then asked what time she went to work in
the morning. She didn't know. She is too young to tell time.
This girl is my muse for helping in the reconstruction of Afghanistan. Her
brown-eyed gaze asks, "Will you do your part to end of the long tunnel of
war I have survived? Or will I become another Afghan orphan forced to work
before I can read?"
Photographs by Marla Ruzicka.
Deborah James is fair trade director of Global
Exchange, an international human rights organization. She also serves on the
board of the Women's
International League for Peace and Freedom.
|