| |
|
John Pilger
The world has been in ferment since September 11, but why weren't there
similar outcries at earlier atrocities?
John Pilger
Guardian
Thursday October 4, 2001
This week saw the end of an
exhibition I helped put on at the Barbican in London, devoted to
photo-journalism that makes sense of terrible events. Brilliant, subversive
pictures from Vietnam show the systematic rape of a country with weapons
designed to spread terror. The exhibition ranged from Hiroshima to two
final, haunting images of sisters, aged 10 and 12, their bodies engraved in
the rubble of the Iraqi city of Basra, where American missiles destroyed
their street two years ago: part of a current Anglo-American bombing
campaign that is almost never reported.
Since the outrages in America on September 11, the exhibition has been
packed, mostly with young people. Many accused the media and politicians of
misrepresenting public opinion and of obscuring the reasons behind the
fanaticism of the attackers. For them, the most telling pictures are of
"unworthy victims". Let me explain. The 6,000 people who died in America on
September 11 are worthy victims: that is, they are worthy of our honour and
a relentless pursuit of justice, which is right. In contrast, the 6,000
people who die every month in Iraq, the victims of a medieval siege devised
and imposed by Washington and Whitehall, are, like the little sisters bombed
to death in their sleep in Basra, unworthy victims - unworthy of even
acknowledgement in the "civilised" west.
Ten years ago, when 200,000 Iraqis died during and immediately after the
slaughter known as the Gulf war, the scale of this massacre was never
allowed to enter public consciousness in the west. Many were buried alive at
night by armoured American snowploughs and murdered while retreating. Colin
Powell, then US military chief, who 22 years earlier was assigned to cover
up the My Lai massacre in Vietnam and is currently being elevated to hero
status in the western media, said: "It's really not numbers I'm terribly
interested in."
An American letter writer to the Guardian last week, in admonishing the
writer Arundhati Roy for producing a "laundry list" of American terror
around the world, revealed how the blinkered think. The lives of millions of
people extinguished as a consequence of American policies, be they Iraqis or
Palestinians, Timorese or Congolese, belong not in our living memory, but on
a "list". Apply that dismissive abstraction to the Holocaust, and imagine
the profanity.
PSD To HTML conversion is important to webmasters because they cannot use the PSD file as it is for their web pages. if you need PSD To HTML conversion service save yourself some time, effort and money and send it in to the professionals. The job of disassociating the September 11 atrocities from the source of
half a century of American crusades, economic wars and homicidal adventures,
is understandably urgent. For Bush and Blair to "wage war against
terrorism", assaulting countries, killing innocents and creating famine,
international law must be set aside and a monomania must take over politics
and the "free" media. Fortunately public opinion is not yet fully
Murdochised and is already uneasy and suspicious; 60% oppose massive
bombing, says an Observer poll. And the more Blair, our little Lord
Palmerston, opens his mouth on the subject the more suspicions will grow and
the crusaders' contortions of intellect and morality will show. When Blair
tells David Frost that his war plans are aimed at "the people who gave [the
terrorists] the weapons", can he mean we are about to attack America? For it
was mostly America that destroyed a moderate regime in Afghanistan and
created a fanatical one.
On the day of the twin towers attack, an arms fair, selling weapons of
terror to assorted tyrants and human rights abusers, opened in London's
Docklands with the backing of the Blair government. Now Bush and Blair have
created what the UN calls "the world's worst humanitarian crisis", with up
to 7m people facing starvation. The initial American reaction was to demand
that Pakistan stop supplying food to the starving who, of course, fail to
qualify as worthy victims.
The bombing intelligentsia (the New Humanitarians, as Edward Herman calls
them) are doing their bit, blaming September 11 on "an evil hatred of
modernity" and something called "apocalyptic nihilism". There are no reasons
why; the Barbican pictures are fake. Aside from a few "errors",
Anglo-American actions are redeemed, and those who produce the "laundry
list" of a blood-soaked historical record are "anti American", which
apparently is similar to the "anti-semitism" of those who dare to point out
the atrocious activities of the Israeli state.
Phyllis and Orlando Rodriguez lost their son Greg in the World Trade
Centre. They said this: "We read enough of the news to sense that our
government is heading in the direction of violent revenge, with the prospect
of sons, daughters, parents, friends in distant lands dying, suffering, and
nursing further grievances against us. It is not the way to go... not in our
son's name."
• www.johnpilger.com
|
|
|